Article I.
The Task is not to believe but read
Dear companionero ,[29]
This is not complete. Though belatedly due to place
and communication restrictions, I am completing these notes as promised under
incredibly difficult and inhuman conditions in response to an Affidavit that
have been fighting to do since November 2007 that would help the courts, the party
and CAAH to resolve this situation that developed between Rachel Evans and
myself. I have been occupying since November 2007 for full equal Socialist
Alliance, Resistance, Resistance Books, Green Left Weekly and Community Action against
Homophobia rights, hoping in this way leaders power and authority over me will
stop being used to personally condemn me but politically rehabilitate us so
that Rachel can keep her promise of return from leave of absence without
punishment. I would like to do so by dealing with the theme set forth in the
title above. It may be of interest to comrade and CAAH readers as Che Guevara
thought it was when he wrote about Socialism and Man in Cuba to the Uruguayan
readers 47 years ago 12 March 1965.
While true Che’s speech needs to be updated to
Socialism and Human in Australia this struggle this testimony doesn’t quite fit
completely into Castro’s speech History Will Absolve me and it doesn’t
completely quite fit completely under Socialism and human as it needed to
combine all the words of all the revolutionaries that have ever existed in
order to explain why Annulling the APVO power and authority over me has been so
important because when it comes to life winning equality it wants as the very
reason why CAAH exists. When it comes to
life winning a revolution it wants as the very reason why Socialist Alliance
exists as Farida Iqbal once told me one does anything to fight for it.
An important thing to note is from a very early age
I have always had to fight to be given an equal go in life because of the
misconception and ignorance by those with power and authority that people from
poverty are stupid. Marion had to fight for us to just be given an equal go in
a public school because of the misconception children born from adultery are
born stupid and that I wouldn’t accept that my birth mother didn’t want us
because my birth mother came and visited me despite being told not to by DOCS
and Lester. When I started asking questions at two years old about the woman in
the Doctors surgery who wanted me when Marion took me for a vaccination, Lester
used the state to get rid of Marion as well as myself by the time I was eight
and had Susan my birth mother put in a psychiatric facility. The underfunded
public education system even though I was doing high school work in year one
and the teachers had recommended I be put in high school, the principle’s
refused because of the misconception that people from poverty are stupid.
People have a right to know the truth that not every
APVO is genuine. If a leader of a workplace organisation applies for an APVO on
another person from the same organisation then it has got to be questioned
especially in cases where the accused person is a new person. Especially in
cases where past suicide and self-harm and calls for help to fight for life are
reported in the applicant’s application. A person calls for help because they
are experiencing violence and prejudice as a result of those with power and authority
over them misjudging them. So if a person is using too much of one form of
communication to call for help such as texting does that mean using the leaders
power and authority over that person who texted too much in the past to put
total communication and place restrictions on their entire human existence to
personally condemn them to death? No! That means opening up other means of
communication to find out what the issue is and coming up with a mutually
agreed solution between the accused and the victim in order to resolve it to
politically rehabilitate them for life.
What scares me the most is how a leader for four
years since November 2007 was able to convince others with power and authority
to use her power and authority over me to personally condemn a victim for
calling for help to fight for life, to finger point instead of listening that
political rehabilitation and not personal condemnation was the answer. I
understand she told bullshit because they didn’t want to listen to the truth
about me.
The one thing I give Rachel credit for throughout
the course of the struggle is that in her own brief of evidence when she
organised the court case back in 2008 is that in writing she never signed
anything that denied who I am. She in fact provided proof that I am a Socialist
Alliance and CAAH activist with a CAAH work reference in her own brief of
evidence. That was when I knew it wasn’t
genuine APVO. I most likely would have
died 5 December 2008 when that APVO using her power and authority over me was
legalised because the truth was denied from being heard if she hadn’t put that
evidence in her brief.
In the 70s lgbti people were criminally charged for
committing mutually consented sexual acts. I find it ironic in the 21st
century it is found hard to accept lgbti people work together the same as our
heterosexual counterparts who don’t have a human need or desire for sex with
each other.
The only reason I went to Rachel’s house in the past
is because she insisted on storing my property at her house when I was
homeless. When she came back from Bolivia in February 2008 I had my own house
and organised for the removal of my property. I left my phone at her house if
she considered it such a problem to get rid of the phone and open up other
means of communication to resolve this. I did that because I kept being told to
wait for Rachel before proceeding with any trial of myself by others.
A common argument from the mouths of capitalist
spokespeople, in the ideological struggle against socialism, campaigning and
the fight for equality involving the replacement of the family, is that
socialism, or the period of building socialism into which we have entered, is
characterized by the abolition of the individual for the sake of the state, for
the sake of the maintaining leaders status quo when a misjudgement of a new
person occurs. I will not try to refute this argument solely on legal or
theoretical grounds but on all grounds both politically and humanly to
establish the facts as they have occurred in Australia. I will do this by
sketching the true history of our revolutionary struggle before November 2007
and after November 2007 when the APVO took power using Rachel Evans power and
authority over me.
Che said when this happened to Castro, “The exact
date of the beginning of the revolutionary struggle — which would culminate in
January 1959 — was July 26, 1953. A group led by Fidel Castro attacked the
Moncada barracks in Oriente Province on the morning of that day. The attack was
a failure; the failure became a disaster; and the survivors ended up in prison,
beginning the revolutionary struggle again after they were freed by an amnesty.
In this process, in which there was only the germ of socialism, the individual
was a fundamental factor. We put our trust in him — individual, specific, with
a first and last name — and the triumph or failure of the mission entrusted to
him depended on that individual's capacity for action. Then came the stage of
guerrilla struggle. It developed in two distinct environments: the people, the
still sleeping mass that had to be mobilized; and its vanguard, the guerrillas,
the motor force of the mobilization, the generator of revolutionary
consciousness and militant enthusiasm. This vanguard was the catalyzing agent
that created the subjective conditions necessary for victory.
My strategy was not to condemn simply because we
were being condemned but to simply to call on all of us to clean up the mess
together with a solution we can all live with rather than putting all the burden
on a few to clean up the mess before it’s too late. We tried on a number of
occasions to see Rachel’s lawyer but was always palmed off to another law firm
and Ms Main I understand she’s got a job to do but she doesn’t listen
In our struggle as is well known began July 2006
where there was indeed a good comrade relationship that was put to the test
from November 2007 that resulted in two comrades becoming scared of each other
with an order in place that was like a three legged race with both running in
opposite directions and not getting anywhere. The exact date which would
culminate the fear of each other as a result of the order November
2007-February 2008 –was 29 August 2008. A couple of leaders Alex Bainbridge and
Rachel Evans from the dream team used the guilt fix method combined with place
and communication restrictions without trial on an sos call for help to fight
for life that resulted in a misjudgement of one of their newest comrade,
myself. Instead of political rehabilitation order a personal condemnation order
resulted from the misjudgement of their comrade. The misjudgement resulted in
the order, the order resulted in a failure, the failure became a disaster, the
disaster became a nightmare and the survivors hoped that once the truth was
heard by our people the solution of amnesty to all the warnings would finally
be listened to would free them from the prison to continue on the revolutionary
struggle.
In this process, in which there was only the germ of
Socialist Alliance and CAAH, two individuals realisation that each other’s
humanity is not the enemy became the fundamental factor in relation to the
uniting question whether we like it or not. New cadre’s put their trust in
leaders to show them the way, leaders put their time and energy into training
their new cadre – both individual, specific with first and last names – and the
triumph or failure of the training mission entrusted on the new cadre depends
on the leader’s faith, guidance and allowance of the new cadre’s developmental capacity into
action. Then came the stage of Guerrilla struggle in defeating the “Mérida” and
the injustice that the order created that created a false history. It developed
in three distinct environments: Those who refused to allow the APVO make them go
to sleep and those that the AVPO order caused to go to sleep since the day a
few leaders created the APVO we live under; the people, the mass that had to be
mobilised; and Socialist Alliance, CAAH, the organisers, the motor force of the
mobilisation, the generator of the revolutionary consciousness and militant
enthusiasm. This vanguard and CAAH was the catalysing agent which created the
subjective conditions necessary for victory in the History Will Absolve Us
campaign.
Here again, in the framework of the
proletarianization of our thinking, of this situation that took place in our
habits, our minds and hearts, the individuals was the basic factor. Every one
of the combatants of the Socialist Alliance who reached an upper rank in the
revolutionary forces has a record of outstanding deeds to their credit. They
attained their rank on this basis without it being at the expense of other
cadre’s human life just to maintain their status quo. I hope this not quite
perfect or complete inarticulate letter will be finally listened to.
No comments:
Post a Comment